|
21-1632
| 1 | Public Comments: This portion of the agenda will be limited to a cumulative total of 15 minutes, with individual speakers limited to a maximum time limit of 3 minutes. Further discussion of any matter beyond 15 minutes will be continued to following the public hearing calendar or scheduled for a later agenda. If there is no one from the audience wishing to speak, the Commission will move to the next order of business. |
Not available
|
|
21-1634
| 2a | The minutes of May 13, 2021 to be presented for approval. |
Not available
|
|
21-1819
| 2b | Planning Commission Attendance - That the Commission excuse the May 13, 2021 absence of Commissioner Kirby due to vacation. |
Not available
|
|
21-1624
| 3 | PLANNING CASES P19-0775 (GPA), P19-0776 (RZ), P19-0777 (DR), P20-0307 (VR), P20-0308 (GE), P20-0309 (GE), P20-0310 (VC-S), AND P19-0905 (EIR): Proposal by Ken Assi of KA Enterprises to consider the following entitlements for the construction of a multi-family residential development, consisting of 237 residential apartment units, on 9.44 acres: 1) General Plan Amendment to amend the project site from C – Commercial to VHDR – Very High Density Residential; 2) Zoning Code Amendment to rezone the project site from CG – Commercial General Zone to R-4 – Multiple Family Residential Zone; 3) Design Review for the proposed site design and building elevations; 4) Variance to allow perimeter solid masonry walls and tubular steel fencing up to 6 feet in height within the front yard setbacks along Central Avenue and Sycamore Canyon Boulevard, where 3 foot high solid walls and 4 foot open fencing are permitted by the Zoning Code; and to allow project improvements to encroach into the 15 foot landscaped front yard setback along Central Avenue, required in the R-4 Zone when adjacent to an arter |
Not available
|
|
21-1625
| 4 | PLANNING CASE PR-2021-001066: A request for Planning Commission annual review of projects included in the fiscal year (FY) 2021/2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and determination that the projects are consistent with General Plan 2025 pursuant to California Government Code Section 65401. The Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department has determined that CIP consistency review is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), because the review is not considered a “project” as defined by section 15378(b)(4). Contact: David Murray, Principal Planner, (951) 826-5773, dmurray@riversideca.gov |
Not available
|
|
21-1638
| 5 | Planning Commission Review - Rules for the Transaction of Business and Conduct of Hearings - Bylaws and Code of Ethics |
Not available
|
|
21-1636
| 6 | Items for future agendas and updates from City Planner and Planning Commissioners. |
Not available
|