Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 21-3597    Version: 1 Name: CED - AC Marriott-11-16-2021
Type: PUBLIC HEARING/PLANNING REFERRALS AND APPEALS Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/26/2021 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/16/2021
Title: CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 12, 2021 - Cases P19-0560, P19-0561, P19-0562 and P19-0563 - Appeals - Determine Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15331 (Historic Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) and 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects), as it constitutes an in-fill and rehabilitation project, consistent with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties - Determine project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Infill Development Projects) of CEQA Guidelines as project will not have significant effect on environment - 3420-3482 Mission Inn Avenue situated on south side of Mission Inn Avenue between Lemon and Lime Streets - Uphold the appeal by Greens Ehrenberg, LLC, of Cultural Heritage Board denial of Certificate of Appropriateness and approve Certificate of Appropriateness for construction of hotel and adaptive reuse...
Attachments: 1. Report, 2. CC Memo - August 17, 2021, 3. CC Minutes - August 17, 2021, 4. CC Memo - October 12, 2021, 5. CC Minutes - October 12, 2021, 6. Attachment 5a - Revised Project Plans and Renderings, 7. Attachment 5b - Revised Project Plans and Renderings, 8. Attachment 5c - Revised Project Plans and Renderings, 9. Attachment 5d - Revised Project Plans and Renderings, 10. Attachment 5e - Revised Project Plans and Renderings, 11. Attachment 5f - Traffic Impact Analysis May 1, 2020, 12. Attachment 6 - Public Comments - 8-17-21, 13. Attachment 7a - Greens AC Marriott Response to Comments - August 17, 2021, 14. Attachment 7b - Greens AC Marriott Response to Comments - October 14, 2021, 15. Attachment 8a - Response to Comments - Supplemental Historical Architecture Assessment, 16. Attachment 8b - Response to Comments - Historic Impact Assessment, 17. Attachment 8c - Response to Comments - Supplimental Noise Assessment, 18. Attachment 8d - Response to Comments - Supplimental Traffic and Parking Study, 19. Attachment 8e - Response to Comments - BBK Response to Comments, 20. Attachment 8f - Response to Comments - Revised Applicant Variance Findings, 21. Attachment 8g - Response to Comments - Additional Comment Letters, 22. Presentation